Fields are not physical?

[[e-mail]]

|>
|>
|> We're discussing that which causes the behavior.
|
| Ha ha ha ha ha! There's the high school dropout trying to sound like he
| knows something again. Ha ha ha ha ha!
|
| Fuckwit, you don't have a fucking clue.
|
Ha ha ha ha ha! As if YOU did, ya fucking imbecile. Ha ha ha ha ha!

Boys, boys! For people "smarter than Einstein" you sure don't seem to
know much. But then, I really don't understand the scientific terms
"Fuckwit" and "Fucking Imbecile". Could you please cite a couple of peer
reviewed papers where the terms are defined?

[Androcles]

"***@teranews.com" <***@iwaynet.net> wrote in message news:pjp%p.28754$***@newsfe04.iad...
| On 8/5/2011 12:53 AM, Androcles wrote:
| > "George Plimpton"<***@si.not> wrote in message
| > news:***@giganews.com...
| > | On 8/4/2011 6:16 PM, ***@. wrote:
| > |>
| > |>
| > |> We're discussing that which causes the behavior.
| > |
| > | Ha ha ha ha ha! There's the high school dropout trying to sound like
he
| > | knows something again. Ha ha ha ha ha!
| > |
| > | Fuckwit, you don't have a fucking clue.
| > |
| > Ha ha ha ha ha! As if YOU did, ya fucking imbecile. Ha ha ha ha ha!
|
| Boys, boys! For people "smarter than Einstein" you sure don't seem to
| know much.

We'll leave out the "seems to" in your case, Jocaby.


| But then, I really don't understand the scientific terms
| "Fuckwit" and "Fucking Imbecile". Could you please cite a couple of peer
| reviewed papers where the terms are defined?
|
I will if you can cite a peer reviewed paper defining the scientific term
"mass" or "matter" since it seems to be composed of no known element
and "seems to" is the order of the day. "Stuff" is just as inadequate.